Why Won't The Media Tell The Truth About Islam?

From The Patriot World and A Charging Elephant:

Why Won’t the Media Tell the Truth about Islam?


July 14, 2010 · Leave a Comment



Walter Brown

The Patriot World



The worst kept secret of our day is that Islam has world domination aspirations and that their well financed infiltration efforts are working. The societal decay that has utterly destroyed life in Arab Countries is firmly planted in North Africa, Western Europe and the United Kingdom and growing in the United States.



Considering the gravity of this issue, it’s natural to ask why the main stream media doesn’t want anything to do with it. Foreign ownership and liberal bias explanations only go so far. So, why is the silence on this issue unanimous?





I strongly suspect that the last thing in the world that the press wants to dig into are the legal limits on religious expression. The reason for this is that a simple investigation of the so-called religious freedom will reveal that it is quite different than what has been advocated. The same misinterpreted clause of the bill of rights that doesn’t guarantee religious freedom also doesn’t guarantee freedom of the press. The last thing that the main stream media wants to confront is the fact that only the Federal Government is forbidden from acting these areas.



Simply stated, the main stream media would rather live under the protections of a lie and allow the US to collapse around them than to tackle the biggest issue of our time.





States and local governments are fully within their authority to challenge freedom of expression, as any reasonable person reading the first, ninth, and tenth amendments to the Constitution can see. Being able to do what ever they like with impunity is a strong incentive to keep the main stream media in line. The founding fathers knew what they were doing when they limited the scope of the first amendment to Congress only.



Thomas Jefferson’s “Kentucky Resolutions” proves that the first Amendment means exactly what it says.



“Resolved, That it is true as a general principle, and is also expressly declared by one of the amendments to the Constitutions, that “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, our prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people; and that no power over the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, or freedom of the press being delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, all lawful powers respecting the same did of right remain, and were reserved to the States or the people: that thus was manifested their determination to retain to themselves the right of judging how far the licentiousness of speech and of the press may be abridged without lessening their useful freedom, and how far those abuses which cannot be separated from their use should be tolerated, rather than the use be destroyed. And thus also they guarded against all abridgment by the United States of the freedom of religious opinions and exercises, and retained to themselves the right of protecting the same, as this State, by a law passed on the general demand of its citizens, had already protected them from all human restraint or interference. And that in addition to this general principle and express declaration, another and more special provision has been made by one of the amendments to the Constitution, which expressly declares, that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press”: thereby guarding in the same sentence, and under the same words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press: insomuch, that whatever violated either, throws down the sanctuary which covers the others, arid that libels, falsehood, and defamation, equally with heresy and false religion, are withheld from the cognizance of federal tribunals. That, therefore, the act of Congress of the United States, passed on the 14th day of July, 1798, intituled “An Act in addition to the act intituled An Act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States,” which does abridge the freedom of the press, is not law, but is altogether void, and of no force.”



Posted by Walter L. Brown Jr. at 2:59 PM Links to this post